In the latest issue of Open magazine, its political editor Hartosh Singh Bal writes on the re-appearance of former Hindustan Times editor Vir Sanghvi on the pages of the newspaper, to underline the the media’s janus-faced approach to the anti-Sikh pogrom of 1984 under Congress watch and the 2002 Gujarat riots under BJP rule:
“Narendra Modi is not just unfit for the post of Prime Minister; he is unfit for any public office. But the shamelessness of such a man is best questioned by a media that is immune to questions about its own motives.
“Just this week, Delhi woke up to an article on the edit page of one of India’s leading newspapers, the Hindustan Times, by none other than Vir Sanghvi.
“Writing in the paper on politics for the first time since his misuse of the same space was rather dramatically highlighted in the Radia Tapes, he commented on the Modi campaign: ‘No matter which party wins, India is certain to lose.’
“It seems even shame has its limits.
“It is no surprise that almost a decade earlier Sanghvi had written about the 1984 massacres: ‘On the more substantive issue of whether the administration allowed Delhi to burn, all the commissions have been unanimous: yes, it did, but this was because of incompetence and negligence, not because of any sinister design. If there is a parallel, it is with the 1993 Bombay riots rather than with Gujarat.’
“Somehow, he always manages to say exactly what the Congress wants to hear. To me it seems that no matter who wins, with his piece being published, journalism in some measure has already lost.”
Read the full column: The end of shame
Also read: Vir Sanghvi and Barkha Dutt: “We were targetted”
HT strips Vir Sanghvi of his editorial advisory role
Vir Sanghvi suspends Hindustan Times column
Vir Sanghvi says his HT column will resume soon
Why we didn’t hear Niira Radia tapes: 2 examples
86% feel let down by CD baat of journalists
Yes I agree that honest Journalist have lot of limitation. from the common field of Journalism. My observation as independent and not committed Journalist that may be there debate about shri Narendra Modi in India and as well as Gujarat, but present Indian sociopolitical phenomenon raised and claimed that ‘Namo’ is needed for BJP also for India. Intellectual, critic, Journalist, economist have reserve rights to criticized the issue and they can also refer history because this is modern India. Democratic India.