Kuldip Nayar on Shekhar Gupta, N. Ram & Co

Kuldip Nayar, 89, the grand old lion of Indian journalism—former editor of the Statesman in Delhi, former managing editor of the United News of India news agency, former correspondent of the London Times, former media advisor to the late prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri, former high commissioner of India to the United Kingdom, and above all a secular, liberal peace monger—has just published his memoirs.

Titled Beyond the Lines (Roli Books, Rs 495), the book brings home a man who can legitimately claim to have seen Mahatma Gandhi at prayer, quizzed Jawaharlal Nehru, watched Mohammed Ali Jinnah closely, worked with Shastri and Govind Ballabh Pant, all figures who are part of history books to whole generations.

The book also throws light on Nayar, the lionhearted journalist who opposed the Emergency and rubbed shoulders with generations of journalists and proprietors:


SHANTI PRASAD JAIN, The Times of India: T.T. Krishmachari was still in the cabinet when Shastri assigned to me the task of findings out from Shanti Prasad Jain whether he would be willing to sell Bennett Coleman, which published the Times of India, Nav Bharat Times and other publications. They were being run by a board that the government had appointed when TTK told Nehru that the owners had been found indulging in malpractices.

Shanti Prasad and his talented wife, Rama Jain, were known to me as we played bridge together. Shanti Prasad had told me to start a Hindi UNI service which he promised to subsidize. I was embarrassed to have to carry Shastri’s message to him. He was upset. He told me that even if he had to sell all his business, including the house in which he was living, he would never sell the Times of India. Shastri returned Bennett Coleman to him.


C.R. IRANI, The Statesman: I was unhappy in the Statesman. Irani had reduced me to the position of consulting editor from resident editor. He then wanted me to vacate my room as well, and asked me to sit somewhere else. Subsequently, he withdrew my peon and telephone too.

What hurt me most was that a colleague and a friend S. Nihal Singh, tried to effect the changes. It was in fact he who conveyed Irani’s decision to me. Nihal’s attitude exuded authority which was humiliating. I could understand Irani’s action but not those of Nihal who himself subsequently suffered at Irani’s hands and had to leave the Statesman.

The only person who stood by me during those days was my secretary, G. Barret. She refused to work with Nihal and preferred to stay on with me. I was reduced to writing only my weekly column, ‘Between the Lines’. Irani tried to stop that too but did not succeed because the editor N.J. Nanporia refused to permit that.


SHEKHAR GUPTA, The Indian Express: I hired many journalists but two of the recruits, Shekhar Gupta and Madhu Kishwar, became celebrities. Shekhar Gupta called me his ‘guru’ but showed no respect when he stopped my fortnightly column. By then he had become all in all in the Express, circumstances having helped him to occupy the position of editor-in-chief. He also became abnormally affluent as well as arrogant.

I liked him when he was a simple straightforward journalist at Chandigarh. Now, Shekhar Gupta was infatuated with himself. His personal views and other considerations shaped the Indian Express which was once India’s most anti-establishment newspaper.

(Update: On its website, Roli Books has issued this clarification: “The new edition of Kuldip Nayar’s widely popular autobiography, Beyond the Lines, now comes with several changes including his remarks relating to Shekhar Gupta, Editor, the Express Group, and his reference to a former president of Sikh Student’s Union, both of which he retracted and regretted for at the launch. All subsequent editions of the book come with these changes.”)


RAMNATH GOENKA, The Indian Express: What shocked me was that RNG removed V.K. Narasimhan, who as editor-in-chief had kept the defiant stance of the Indian Express intact, a couple of days after Indira Gandhi lost power. His name was removed from the print line and substituted by S. Mulgaonkar’s, without Narasimhan’s knowledge.

He resigned to register his protest. The entire senior editorial staff signed a petition against Goenka’s action. I was approached to sign it. I told them that I would not do so but after speaking to Goenka who was in the guest-house. I asked if the news about Narasimhan’s removal was correct.

He said he had to restore Mulgaonkar to his position to correct the wrong done to him. ‘Was it necessary to do so in the manner you have,’ I asked. He said that he should have reverted Narasimha to his original position at the Financial Express and seemed regretful.

When I told him about the revolt in the office he said they should not forget what he has gone through during the Emergency. I could see repentance on his face. He wanted me to go to Narasimhan’s house and bring him back. I went there and found him sitting in the floor having a cup of coffee his wife had prepared. I requested him to rejoin as editor of the Financial Express and assured him that RNG was apologetic.

For Narasimhan, the question of joining the Express group again did not arise. He asked me how long had I known RNG. Before I could reply, he said: ‘Kuldeep, I have known him for 30 years. Goenka has not changed. He is as selfish as ever.’

How courageous and noble a man was Narasimhan, I thought. He had no job to go to and yet took a stand whenever there was attack on his dignity. I had close relations with the Deccan Herald family and got him posted as editor-in-chief of the newspaper.


AVEEK SARKAR, Ananda Bazaar Patrika: I resumed my syndicated weekly column, ‘Between the Lines’ after my return from the UK. Even within the brief period of a year when I was in London, Indian journalism had changed dramatically and become owner-driven.

For instance, Anand Bazar Patrika reflected Aveek Sarkar’s views. His father, Asok Sarkar, was a friend of mine so I treated Aveek like a member of the family. He once told me that he was the second most important person in West Bengal after Jyoti Basu, who was then alive.

Much earlier the Rajasthan Patrika had stopped publishing my column. The owner, R.C. Kulish, was a personal friend but could not tolerate my criticism of the BJP position. ‘I am not against Muslims and I have one servant from the community but they have to be kept in their place,’ he told me once. Never did I suspect that he would go so far as to stop the publication of the column. I vainly tried to meet him in Jaipur. Once when in the city, I learnt he was critically ill, so I went to his house and waited to see him but he refused to meet me.

In the case of Dainik Bhaskar, I stopped my columns because it refused to publish my piece on ‘paid news’. Although I did not name anyone the newspaper still refused to publish the column. I wrote a letter of protest to the owner and received no response.


N. RAM, The Hindu: My experience with N. Ram, the editor of the Hindu was disappointing. I used to write an opinion piece for the newspaper twice a week and a human rights column once a month. He stopped them because I was a friend of Malini Parthasarthy who, along with N. Ravi, was pushed out of editorial control when they were reduced to a minority in the public limited company that the Hindu is.

Ram joined G. Kasturi and a few others to constitute a majority. Ravi, modest and unassuming, and Malini, a talented journalist, suffered the most but stoically bore the humiliation. When newspapers turn themselves into companies and the majority begins to prevail, the newspaper becomes a purely commercial proposition like any corporate house.


SAMIR JAIN, The Times of India: Sham Lal once told me that he as the editor of the Times of India, was never rung up by Shanti Prasad Jain, the then owner of the newspaper, and that the latter did not even remotely suggest to him which line he should adopt on any particular subject. Throughout Shamlal’s long tenure, Shanti Prasad never expressed his disapproval of anything the editor wrote.

By contrast, the attitude of his son, Ashok Jain, who inherited Bennett Coleman & Co, was quite different. He was committed to commercial success and would ensure that the newspaper did not come into conflict with his business interests or those he promoted.

Girilal Jain, the then editor of the Times of India, rang me up one day to ask whether I could speak to Ashokj Jain, whom I knew well, to get Samir Jain, his son, off his back. Giri said that Ashok Jain, whatever his preferences, treated him well but Samir’s attitude was humiliating.

Inder Malhotra once recounted to me how senior journalists were made by Samir to sit on the floor in his room to write out the names of invitees on cards sent by the organization.

I flew to Bombay and spoke to Ashok who frankly said he would have no hesitation in supporting his son because the latter had increased the revenue tenfold, from Rs 8 lakhs to 80 lakhs. ‘I can hire many Giri Lal Jains if I pay more but not a Samir,’ said Ashok. I conveyed this to Giri who did not last long with the newspaper.

Photograph: courtesy Jitender Gupta/ Outlook


  1. Most of what Kuldip Nayar writes, makes sense, particularly about modern day editors. They are miles away from journalism, obsessed with their own skewed images, hopping from one TV studio to the other, and wearing a ‘know-all, know-everything’ attitude on their cuffs. God save us.

    1. Syed Munir Hussain Shah Bukhari

      Kuldip Nayar is a prodigal son of Sialkot, one the the rarest oldest ‘living cities’ of the world. Sans barriers, we are proud of him. Since he left Sialkot for good, this facinating city has been emerged as the symbol of Public Private Partnership initiative in the world by constructiive its own all weather magnificant international airport. We wish and pray on find morning Nayyar Sahib’s plane would land on Sialkot Airport. Munir H. Shah, General Secretary, Sialkot Forum, Islamabad/Pakistan

  2. #Memoirs: Settle scores with former rivals or bete noires, sanitize your personal history to present glowing self-tributes.

    #Memoirs: Drop a few names, describe in graphic detail your sexual exploits (if you had any), but above all pour out your bile or venom.

    When and why did Kuldeep Nayar become “secular” in the perverted sense of the word? After Pakistani newspapers began publishing his articles?

    Why did he turn against the BJP. Did he expect BJP to reward him for “sharing” a jail with its leaders during the emergency and became disgruntled when they did not do so?

  3. Sam

    is he a journalist or a broker trying to pass on messages and broker deals…SAD if he is the grand lion of Indian Journalism

  4. For the first time in his life Kuldip Nayar seems to have written something that does not sound cliched.

    At ripe old age, this guy has learned to move away from the usual set of liberal banalities, which he has been airing for all his life in print in such abundant profusion.

    It is good to know that Kuldip has some real feelings (whether right or wrong) and he can actually express them….

  5. For the first time in his life Kuldip Nayar seems to have written something that does not sound cliched.

    At ripe old age, this guy has learned to move away from the usual set of liberal banalities, which he has been ejaculating for all his life in print in such abundant profusion.

    It is good to know that Kuldip has some real feelings (whether right or wrong) and he can actually express them….

  6. This old man has been a broker for decades. Who made him a High Commissioner and a Rajya Sabha member? For what? What is so great in going to jail? Even my father went to jail during the Emergency. He was not even from the opposition. He was a local Congress leader, who opposed the Emergency. My father was not a journalist to write a memoir.

  7. Kuldip Nayar had to go to jail (during the emergency) not because of his intrepid journalism but because he happened to be the son-in-law of Bhimsen Sachar, former Congress CM (Punjab) and Governor (Orissa) who opposed Indira Gandhi in the party’s internal power struggles. If one goes by the way he now kowtows to the powers-that-be, he has always been drifting with the political wind. He is not in the same league as Arun Shourie, C.R.Irani or V.K.Narasimhan.

  8. debasisha mohapatra

    Agrre with most of the critics of nayyar,who had no writing style,a crony of the powerful

  9. A Journalist

    I just finished reading his biography. It is full of ‘I did this and that, I was somebody’s postman, I met him and them etc’. It reads like biography of a crony of the powerful, not like biography of a journalist.

    Truly, he is a miracle!!

  10. cnm

    It remains to be seen if he has written about his link with Gulam Nabi Fai.

  11. Arun

    One broker of the politicians cribbing about more powerful brokers of today like Gupta and N Ram..seems like a case of sour grapes more than anything. People like Nayar signify the baleful influence the Punjab-dilli money is everything culture has had on India.

  12. Ali Khan

    Kuldip Nayar is the finest journalist in India-Pakistan.
    I always enjoyed reading his columns. A biography
    contains the full range of activities over a life time.
    If Mr. Nayar writes about people he dealt with on a
    variety of issues, it is appropriate. Actually it will
    detract from the quality of bio if omitted all that. He lived
    his eventful life well and wish him many more fruitful

  13. kuldip nayar is one among the top journalists with extraordinary contacts. As one who worked under him 35 years ago, i could recall his story on the resignation of George Fernandes from Morarji ministry. When Nayar wrote that fernandes has tendered his resignation, the Government denied it. But when he reiterated saying the “resignation
    letter is on the table of PM” , the Govt was forced to keep quiet. Hats off to Nayar.

  14. Old or young, all journalists who infest the English press are spineless and blabber when the policeman is not around. I like books by journalists because they wash the dirty linen of their colleagues, exposing what each great editor who brags ihe is a pillar of secularism is in real life.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.