Can not reviewing a book become anti-national?

The Indian English media’s relationship with the literary world is, at best, a tempestuous one. The country’s biggest newspaper, The Times of India, does not, as a matter of policy, carry reviews of books by Indians although Salman Rushdie‘s latest squeeze or V.S. Naipual‘s visits to prostitutes will get acres of coverage.

The English magazines at least have designated books’ editors but the range of books reviewed is limited. On television, the country’s most respected English language network, NDTV, has a dedicated weekly programme called Just Books (Saturdays, 12.30 pm) hosted by Sunil Sethi, formerly of India Today and Sunday Mail.

On top of that, there are all the usual questions: Do enough readers read books to merit dedicated coverage? Do book review-reading readers buy books? Should the media be bothered about who buys the books? Should books in the Indian languages get coverage in the English media? Who decides what books to review, what author to feature? Can an author demand coverage as a matter of right? Etcetera.

Enter, Amaresh Misra (in picture), film critic turned columnist turned war analyst.

Author of Mangal Pandey: The true story of an Indian revolutionary (Rupa) and the biography Lucknow: Fire of grace (HarperCollins), the Allahabad-born Misra wrote his magnum opus War of Civilizations: India, South Asia, Europe and the World, to mark the sesquicentenary year of the Indian war of independence last year.

But, Misra claims that NDTV’s Sethi refused to feature the book or the author on his programme. Worse, Misra alleges that Sethi made “racist remarks” over the phone. That exchange has led to a fullblown war of words between the author and the channel.

Misra has dashed off an angry, invective-laden letter to the channel’s compliance officer, Rajiv Mathur, alleging, among other things, an “anti-India attitude” and a bias against “secular authors from the Hindi-Urdu belt”.

Dear Mr Rajiv Mathur,

At the outset let me explain some things to you. I have not written War of Civilisations “allegedly”; it has been published by Rupa in January 2008. It has been reviewed in The Hindu, The Indian Express, Financial Express, Hindustan Times, and other Hindi, Urdu, Marathi and Gujarati journals and magazines.

It seems you are too ignorant a person, you do not read newspapers, and you do not care to check facts. You look down upon Hindi, the regional language and the Urdu press. Obviously, Sunil Sethi has fooled you.

You lie when you say “we neither appreciate nor entertain any requests, influence” in Just Books or any other program. You do not give enough space to secular views especially if they come from the Hindi-Urdu belt. In 2004, your channel too succumbed to portraying that BJP is going to win. All you English speaking ignorant people got that one wrong.

You have a prejudice against the Hindi-Urdu belt and Muslims; because that is the land and those are the people who gave India freedom, something which you anti-national people do not like; the Hindi belt also, does not speak in your wimpish language.

I am writing a letter to all leading secular politicians from Lalu Yadav, Ram Vilas Paswan, Sonia Gandhi, to V.P. Singh, and Sitaram Yechury, and all other intellectuals who respect me as a writer.

This is now war.

I was in a mood to compromise but you guys are too smug. It would be interesting to see how even the BJP will react to the fact of Prannoy Roy‘s British ancestry and how that has translated into an anti-India attitude in NDTV English.

I have no quarrel with NDTV Hindi.

The letter I am writing will explain how the only detailed book written by an Indian on the 150th anniversary of 1857 was ignored by NDTV. Sunil Sethi personally told me that he has time for Salman Rushdie and not for me. You first review William Dalrymple‘s book (The Last Mughal) and then you ignore mine, which is a bigger work on 1857 and which has created waves in London as you can see from the Guardian article attached with this mail.

Tell me if you were in my place, what would you have construed? Isn’t this racism? Dalrymple is white, so he is reviewed but not Amaresh Misra because he is dark?

Now you will say that you have reviewed other Indian writers. Let us make a list of those writers. And let us see who they are. They are people who are anti-small town India. Barring exceptions, they are people who cannot digest the fact that a dark skinned man like me someone who is rugged, capable of taking on all you guys single-handedly in intellect, use of English language and physical strength, who laughs at the pathetic pretensions of Delhi’s English pseudo-elite wimpish culture and their kowtowing to “C” grade foreigners roaming in Delhi—has written a book which can be compared to likes of Kay, Malleson and Eric Stokes. It would be too much, of course, to expect that you have even heard of these names.

As it is Sunil Sethi knows nothing and even your English speaking Delhi intelligentsia laughs at him. Charlie Chaplin would have made a film called The Small Book Buffoon on him. If you had ignored my any other book (which you have) I might not have complained. But this is a book on 1857—it is about Indian nationalism.

You cannot, I repeat, cannot ignore it, whatever happens.

A thousand NDTVs can be closed down, a thousand Prannoy Roys, Rajiv Mathurs and Sunil Sethis of the world can be grinded into dust on the issue of Indian nationalism. The British killed 10 million Indians; Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life; what are you in front of them—not even a speck in the dust.

The issue is too large. You guys take direct orders from foreign embassies and on the nuclear deal your views are pro-American. 1857 goes against pro-Americanism. That is why you do not want to publicise the book.

You guys are racists—you portray UP and Bihar as a land of darkness; you do not want to give a chance to a man from that region, even though he is far more accomplished than all of you put together. I will charge you formally with the criminal charge of racism and anti-national activities.

Let hell reign.

Amaresh Misra

Photograph: courtesy Kedar Nene/Fotocorp, The Hindu


  1. This was very funny!

    The guy is obviously a pompous ass. He deserves every cold-shoulder that he gets.

  2. Anil

    NDTV do not have any national interest they just want TRP.
    many of the issues are against the nation interest that they broadcast. there is no meaning in just reviewing the book.

  3. Hehhhh

    Sunil Sethi seriously sucks. He is every bit of an ass as Amaresh makes him out to be.

    That said, all friend A.M has to do is to ensure his book is so big that it shows up NDTV’s attitude as bad business sense. There is very little point in the logic “I wrote about India, so all patriots must pay attention” that Mishra rails about.

  4. Janasamanya

    NDTV is country’s most respected English TV channel! Aha, what a joke….

  5. Aatmasakshi

    What a ridiculous rant!

    Maybe the books editor of NDTV made racist remarks, or maybe he did not. We will never know unless Misra recorded the conversation. But why should the author bring in Prannoy Roy’s “European ancestry” into the picture?

    If phrases like “This is now war” and “Let hell reign” are any indication, Amaresh Misra is either out of his mind or suffers from a major literary frustration. One hopes his book has more mental balance or literary polish than the evidence Misra provides through this letter.

  6. Akanksha

    I think Mr Misra has a point. The content in elecronic media and press has become so fluffy that one wonders where news gets lost- all we read and watch is bollywood and elephants and men falling into holes, or marital relationships and their failures. The english media does not longer talk about real issues, farmers, poverty, state of the country’s youth. effects of liberalistion, victimisation etc. I am proud to see that someone like mr Misra has the courage to come out and spell this new trend of ass licking the goraas/ pseud- liberals again.

    All my support-

  7. Anurag Kumar

    Though there is much merit in what Mr. Mishra says and being author of the first English novel on the events of 1857 ever written by a Lucknowite I wish to advise him just a little restraint. What has merit will survive . He himself said ………… is larger than martyrs and ‘1857’ and all that but he should allow his own work to eshtablish itself and I am sure people will be flocking to him for permission for extracts from his book. I am not very liberal with praise and specially for those whom my unconscious mind may regard as competitors but I give it to him that he has opened up a new vista for all future historical research specially on 1857 and that in itself is no small contribution. Perhaps people may not realize it just at present but imagine the first steam engine , of course it cannot be compared to the one that drives the Bullet Train but nevertheless it was the FIRST.

  8. wiki

    Here is some reality check on NDTV:

    It was the undisputed leader till competition came and now has to fight for the #1 slot with one man show called “Times Now”. Thats how pathetic NDTV has become.

    The aura surrounding NDTV has long been gone and u dont any longer arrive only if u r featured o NDTV. So Misra wud do himself a favour if he forgets about NDTV.

    Check NDTV’s latest financial figures and they r pathetic ….it again another yr of big losses. The bottom line is that the Roys dont know how to run a business and again they have hoodwinked some investor and sold some stake to them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.