The first casualty of a scoop interview is grace

Aziz Haniffa‘s Abroad interview with India’s ambassador to the United States Ronen Sen has been the big story of the week.

The “headless chicken” quote has become canon fodder for the communists and other critics opposing the UPA government’s nuclear deal with America. Parliament has been stalled, apologies have been tendered, statements have been read in Parliament, and there have been cries for the recall of the ambassador.

But guess how many of our media houses have had the good grace to either name the Sri Lanka-born Haniffa—who earlier scooped an interview with George W. Bush—in reporting the aftermath of the Sen interview, or in naming the media organisation he works for?

Asian Age: named but not Haniffa

CNN-IBN: did not name Haniff or

Deccan Chronicle: named but not Haniffa

Deccan Herald: did not name Haniffa or

DNA: did not name Haniffa or

Hindustan Times: did not name Haniffa or

NDTV: did not name Haniffa or

The Hindu: named both Haniffa and

The Indian Express: named but didn’t name Haniffa

The Telegraph: did not name Haniff or

The Times of India: did not name Haniffa or

(Some newspapers and TV channels carried feeds of Press Trust of India, which too did not name Haniffa or However Indo-Asian News Service, whose earlier avatar Haniffa worked for, named

Are our media houses reluctant to name rivals because they do not wish to give publicity to rival organisations? Do they fail to acknowledge a web portal because they have websites of their own? Is it sour grapes? Is it a fair practice?

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.