Switch on that lovely chandelier, darling

How many of us journalists have houses which can support chandeliers? Worse, how many of our readers have houses which can support chandeliers? The answer to the first question is easy. The answer to the second is not so easy. But sometimes it might be useful to ask these questions as we did at this evening’s editorial meeting.

The provocation was an item on Usha Prasad‘s BVT list on the said subject for the Monday paper. (Because of advanced deadlines, our BVT is now a “cold product”. In other words, the supplement is put to bed around 2 pm, unlike the main edition. So, invariably we are talking of stories much before the deadline and dateline.)

Anyway, the mention of the word chandelier provoked the usual guffaw from the bleeding heart liberals in the crowd (and who doesn’t know who they are). Can our readers afford such chandeliers? Does such information serve any purpose? It’s the same question we ask when we see the recipes of exotic dishes made by five-star chefs.

Who in his (or her) right mind would make them?

The richest journalist among us (the man who went 700-foot down to dig a borewell for his darling daughter’s new house) doesn’t have chandeliers. Son of Srikantaiah doesn’t have one. Ditto and likewise.

So, why do we run them?

The answer is obvious and slightly disappointing: Features like these come easy. Well-oiled PR machineries whirr into action when the subject is broached, and a ready-to-print information comes complete with breathtaking pictures as attachments. Sure, the reporter/writer does some legwork, but does it serve the reader beyond inspiring awe, or, worse, a yawn?

On the other hand, as Usha says, how many times can we keep writing on the 60W bulbs we have at home?


  1. Usha

    Wow, that was a great and speedy job by our smart editor (a chalta phirtha Encyclopaedia). Sir, FYI, my team of young beauties are upset that u call their hard work supported by well-oiled PR machinery. That’s bad!!!!!
    At you behest, let me ask all my fellow VTites to go and light their 60W bulb.

  2. u know hu

    Entirely agree with Usha, not on the ground she has advanced, no offence meant to young beauties, please, but at least on the day this blog carried kalam cribbing on media going negative, the chandliers should have been lit and not blown away.

  3. 40watts

    Strange argument above. This is like someone saying men can’t get pregnant and hence should not show interest in pregnancy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.